Re: [ADMIN] slower every day - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From G u i d o B a r o s i o
Subject Re: [ADMIN] slower every day
Date
Msg-id 20040901105715.1489B6C4FD@tino.sinectis.com.ar
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-performance
The solution appeared as something I didn't know

  On the .conf file

Previous situation:

#log_something=false
log_something=true

Worst situation
#log_something=false
#log_something=true

Nice situation
log_something=false
#log_something=true


Ok, the problem was that I assumed that commenting a value on
the conf file will set it up to a default (false?). I was wrong.
My server was writting tons of log's.

Is this the normal behavior for pg_ctl reload? It seems that looks for new values, remembering the last state on the
onesthat actually are commented. Although it's my fault to have 2 (tow) lines for the same issue, and that I should
realizethat this is MY MISTAKE, the log defaults on a reload, if commented, tend to be the last value entered? 

Regards,
Guido


> Am Mittwoch, 1. September 2004 12:06 schrieb G u i d o B a r o s i o:
> >   The problem is the time that the postgres takes to perform/return a
> > query. For example, trying the \d <tablename> command takes between 4 or 5
> > seconds. This table is very big, but I am not asking for the rows, only
> > asking the table schema, so...why is this so slow?!?!? My last
> > administrative action into this table was a reindex to all the indexes via
> > the BKI in standalone mode. I thought I suceed, but this was las saturday.
>
> Do you regularly vacuum and analyze the database?
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut
> http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Shridhar Daithankar
Date:
Subject: Re: slower every day
Next
From: G u i d o B a r o s i o
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] slower every day