Re: make LockRelation use top transaction ID - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: make LockRelation use top transaction ID
Date
Msg-id 20040724150351.GA4038@dcc.uchile.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: make LockRelation use top transaction ID  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: make LockRelation use top transaction ID  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 09:49:05AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl> writes:
> > I just figured that if we let LockRelation use GetCurrentTransactionId()
> > then the wrong thing happens if we let large objects survive
> > subtransaction commit/abort.
> 
> > So I have changed it to use GetTopTransactionId() instead.  Is that OK
> > with everybody?
> 
> No, at least not if you made that a global change.  Doing it that way
> will mean that a failed subtransaction will not release its locks, no?

Hmm ... won't they be released when the ResourceOwner is released?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Ni aun el genio muy grande llegaría muy lejos
si tuviera que sacarlo todo de su propio interior" (Goethe)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Nested xact status?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: make LockRelation use top transaction ID