Rajesh Kumar Mallah wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah@trade-india.com> writes:
> >
> >
> >>Looks like alter table does not tells about the indexes it dropped
> >>
> >>
> >
> >This is intentional --- we don't require you to say CASCADE to get rid
> >of an index, either.
> >
>
> I initailly ran the alter table without cascade option ,
>
> it told me there is a dependent view.
>
> I did cascade , it droped the view and it also dropped a
> multicolumn index that contained the column.
>
> I notified me about the dropped view but not about
> the index.
>
> Is that ok ?
I think so. We consider the index to be bound to the table, while the
view is more distinct and could include other table references as well.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
