Tom Lane wrote:
> "Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com> writes:
> > 1. alter table alter type on a clustered index seems to drop the cluster
>
> I tweaked things so that the clustered flag is preserved for indexes
> that aren't directly affected by the ALTER TYPE. It would take more
> work to preserve the setting for an index that is rebuilt by ALTER TYPE,
> and I'm not even sure that it's sensible --- the new index could have
> a significantly different ordering from the old. What do you think?
At a minimum, we should indicate we dropped the cluster on the index.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
