Re: SET WITHOUT CLUSTER patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: SET WITHOUT CLUSTER patch
Date
Msg-id 200405022223.i42MNUG09366@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SET WITHOUT CLUSTER patch  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: SET WITHOUT CLUSTER patch
List pgsql-hackers
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Uh, if the CLUSTER doesn't recurse, the WITHOUT shouldn't either, I
> > think, and throwing an error seems fine to me, even if it isn't the same
> > wording as a syntax error.
> 
> Well, maybe - up to you.

Well, if we don't recurse on creation, does it make sense to recurse on
destruction?  Seems it might surpise people.  Do we have that asymetry
in any other area?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixed directory locations in installs
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixed directory locations in installs