Your TPC-H test - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Josh Berkus
Subject Your TPC-H test
Date
Msg-id 200404211041.22711.josh@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-advocacy
Mr. Gomez,

Hi!   I just read your TPC-H test restult posting.    Thank you for taking the
time to do such a significant job reporting the results.

Unfortunately, your setup for the test could use some help from us.   Mainly:

1) For any reasonable results, PostgreSQL must be tuned to non-default
parameters.   See in particular:
http://www.varlena.com/varlena/GeneralBits/Tidbits/perf.html
We do realize that it imposes a burden on such tests to need manual
configuration of the database server.   However, that's a problem we're not
going to solve for PostgreSQL this week, so please let us help you.   Your
load time of days for the data in particular indicates a tuning problem; when
I ran TPC-H, data loaded in under an hour.

2) Testing MyISAM tables on MySQL without Foriegn keys or transactions
invalidates your test; these are requirements of the TPC and not optional.
You should test on an installation of MySQL which supports these features.

3) I would also like to see you test the current CVS for PostgreSQL.   We've
been working with the OSDL to improve our TPC-H test results, and the queries
which timed out now return correct results.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Advocacy Volunteer
http://advocacy.postgresql.org
San Francisco

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Rob
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What can we learn from MySQL?
Next
From: Grega Bremec
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks