Re: License for PostgreSQL for commercial purpose - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From listas@lozano.eti.br
Subject Re: License for PostgreSQL for commercial purpose
Date
Msg-id 20040327031223.A51D01A8741@smtp.infolink.com.br
Whole thread Raw
In response to License for PostgreSQL for commercial purpose  ("Eric Yum" <eric.yum@ck-lifesciences.com>)
List pgsql-admin
Hi,

> > | The Postgres license is a free software license that is GPL
> > | compatible.
> >
> > Where GPL compatible means (possibly among other things) that I can get
> > a BSD-licensed Postgresql and turn it into a GPL-licensed MyPostgresql ?
> >
> No, it means you can distribute the two together like on a redhat CD
> without worrying about conflicting licenses.

If I understand the licenses correctly, the point about being GPL-compatible is
not putting everything on a CD. It's linking gpl code with non-gpl code. Say, I
create a command-based dump utility for PostgreSQL (and so links the pgsql
clientlibrary) but use the GNU Readline library for command-listory (which is
gpl'ed). If the PostgreSQL license wasn't compatible, I would bot be able to
link the Readline library into my executable.


[]s, Fernando Lozano


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Doug Quale
Date:
Subject: Re: License for PostgreSQL for commercial purpose
Next
From: Sam Barnett-Cormack
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres copy command very slow.