Re: GForge WAS: Feeds Integration - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: GForge WAS: Feeds Integration
Date
Msg-id 200402201219.57949.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GForge WAS: Feeds Integration  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
Responses Re: GForge WAS: Feeds Integration  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-www
Dave,

> Well, hang on. Why Gforge? Are there other solutions? If so then I think
> any voting/discussions/whatever should include the choice of new
> platform.

Do you have another proposal?   Like I said, I'll be putting forward the case
for GForge; if there's another program you like, feel free to
counter-propose.

But I'm not gonna spend a bunch o' time reseaching other platforms when I
believe that GForge suits our needs.

> It's also normal to have the discussion before a vote rather than the
> other way round as you are proposing (unless I misunderstand what you've
> written), so that people can make a properly informed vote.

As if I could prevent discussion.   My point is that this has been discussed,
off and on, on this list and elsewhere repeatedly without any action being
taken.   I'm going to throw up a specific proposal for action, and if people
shoot it down, then so be it.   But just to discuss the topic in general --
again -- is a recipe for paralysis.

--
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco


pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: GForge WAS: Feeds Integration
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: PDF docs in CVS broken