> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh@agliodbs.com]
> Sent: 20 February 2004 20:20
> To: Dave Page; PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] GForge WAS: Feeds Integration
>
> Dave,
>
> > Well, hang on. Why Gforge? Are there other solutions? If so then I
> > think any voting/discussions/whatever should include the
> choice of new
> > platform.
>
> Do you have another proposal? Like I said, I'll be putting
> forward the case
> for GForge; if there's another program you like, feel free to
> counter-propose.
I'm not fussed either way - I'm just trying to suggest not putting in
effort building a new VM and configuring Gforge prior to discussion.
Someone else may convince everyone that something else is better thus
wasting all your hard work.
> As if I could prevent discussion.
I'm not saying you could. It sounded like you wanted a vote first and
discussion later which sounds like a recipe for disaster. Like I said
though, I might have misunderstood you.
> My point is that this has
> been discussed,
> off and on, on this list and elsewhere repeatedly without any
> action being taken.
Well yeah, but that's because we decided to stick with Gborg.
> I'm going to throw up a specific proposal for
> action, and if people
> shoot it down, then so be it.
Fair enough, can't (and wouldn't) argue with that.
Regards, Dave.
