It's content we carry on the website, why wouldn't it be in the websites CVS
tree?
Robert Treat
On Friday 20 February 2004 15:36, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> stupid question, but is there a resaon why we have a PDF version of the
> docs in CVS in the first place?
>
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Robert Treat wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 February 2004 15:06, Alexey Borzov wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > PDF docs for versions 7.3 and 7.4 were added to CVS without -kb switch
> > > (binary) and thus are effectively broken. :[
> >
> > Broken is a strong word, I'd just say misconfigured. Looked through my
> > command history on the 7.4 pdfs and noticed that the first one I uploaded
> > I did use -kb but when I decided to rename the file I forgot it on the
> > second pass (guess I should have gone to bed first...) Anywho, I *think*
> > I have things updated to have the -kb flag, can you confirm this on your
> > end?
> >
> > Robert Treat
> > --
> > Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
