Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64
Date
Msg-id 20040123205056.GA12933@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64
List pgsql-performance
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 11:05:41AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/

Yes, I guess I shoulda thought of that, eh?  Thanks.  The docs do
suggest that there are some significant differences between the two
versions of the filesystem, so I'm not sure how sanguine I'd be about
the degree of "testing" the filesystem has received on Linux.  On the
other hand, I wouldn't be surprised if it were no worse than the
other options.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace.
        --Philip Greenspun

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64