Re: ISM shared memory on solaris - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: ISM shared memory on solaris
Date
Msg-id 200310271830.h9RIUEg14830@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ISM shared memory on solaris  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: ISM shared memory on solaris  (Josh Wilmes <jwilmes@cisco.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>
> > ! #if defined(sun) && defined(__sparc__)
> >       /* use intimate shared memory on SPARC Solaris */
> >       memAddress = shmat(shmid, 0, SHM_SHARE_MMU);
> >   #else
>
> I think this is going in the wrong direction.  Why isn't the code just
>
> #if defined(SHM_SHARE_MMU)
>     /* use intimate shared memory on Solaris */
>     memAddress = shmat(shmid, 0, SHM_SHARE_MMU);
> #else
>
> If the symbol is available I think we probably want to use it.  It is an
> O/S issue, not a hardware issue, and so the test on __sparc__ seems
> quite wrongheaded ...

What I was hoping to do with the define test was to throw an error if we
don't find intimate shared memory on Solaris, but the define doesn't
work fir i386/Solaris so we are probably better going with the define as
you suggest --- I just hope we don't fail to include a file and somehow
miss it on some version of Solaris.

Change applied.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ISM shared memory on solaris
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Transaction bug