Re: Unicode upper() bug still present - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: Unicode upper() bug still present
Date
Msg-id 20031021.180713.74751617.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unicode upper() bug still present  (Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>)
Responses Re: Unicode upper() bug still present
List pgsql-hackers
>  Why  cannot  do PostgreSQL  as  100%  pure  Unicode system? We  can  do
>  conversion  from/to  others  encodings as  client/server  communication
>  extension, but  internaly in BE  we can  use only pure  Unicode data. I
>  think a lot of things will more simple...

Please don't do that. There's a known issue of round trip conversion
between Unicode and other encodings and still the existing encodings
are very important for many users.

Also I think DBMS should not rely on particular encoding
implementation.
--
Tatsuo Ishii


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Unicode upper() bug still present
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Unicode upper() bug still present