Re: Unicode upper() bug still present - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Karel Zak
Subject Re: Unicode upper() bug still present
Date
Msg-id 20031021075030.GA7478@zf.jcu.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unicode upper() bug still present  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Unicode upper() bug still present  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>)
Re: Unicode upper() bug still present  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:58:00PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> (Note that I say Unicode a lot here because those people do a lot of
> research and standardization in this area, which is available for free,
> but this does not constrain the result to work only with the Unicode
> character set.)
Why  cannot  do PostgreSQL  as  100%  pure  Unicode system? We  can  doconversion  from/to  others  encodings as
client/server communicationextension, but  internaly in BE  we can  use only pure  Unicode data. Ithink a lot of things
willmore simple...
 
   Karel

-- Karel Zak  <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: obj_description problems?
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Unicode upper() bug still present