Re: Performance weirdness with/without vacuum analyze - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Harry Broomhall
Subject Re: Performance weirdness with/without vacuum analyze
Date
Msg-id 200310141248.NAA46011@haeb.noc.uk.easynet.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Performance weirdness with/without vacuum analyze  (Harry Broomhall <harry.broomhall@uk.easynet.net>)
List pgsql-general
Greg Stark writes:
>
> Harry Broomhall <harry.broomhall@uk.easynet.net> writes:
>
> >    I'm not entirely sure how I would do this, as the 'lookup' is actualy
> > a join.  I thought that the order of nameing the joined tables didn't
> > matter (except for 'left' and 'right'), similar to the fact that 1 + 2 is
> > the same as 2 + 1.
>
> Outer joins are commutative (1+2 == 2+1) at least barring the left/right
> issue. But they are not associative. (1+2)+3 != 1+(2+3).


   Thanks for the info.  I was fairly sure that both the above were true,
but it is nice to be certain!

   Regards,
      Harry.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Renê Salomão
Date:
Subject: Re: Create Function... ERROR: language "plpgsql" does
Next
From: Jeff
Date:
Subject: Re: Index on timestamp to date field