Mendola Gaetano wrote:
> "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
> > Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> > > "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
> > > > I see other strdup() calls that don't check on a return. Should we
> deal
> > > > with those too?
> > >
> > > Well strdup obtain the memory for the new string using a malloc
> > > and normally is a good habit check the return value of a malloc.
> >
> > Right. My point is that we have lots of other strdup's in the code.
> > Should we fix those too? Seems we should be consistent.
>
> Shall I post the patch for SetVariable ?
>
> I know that this change is not so important but I want to try
> on my skin the cycle
> seen somethink wrong => send patch => be applyed
Sure.
It would be good if you would evaluate all the strdups, find the ones
that don't check properly, and submit a big patch of all those. The fix
can be to call xstrdup, or to check the return code.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
