Re: Redhat's "enhancements" to PG - Mailing list pgsql-general

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: Redhat's "enhancements" to PG
Date
Msg-id 20030627193438.J1067@hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Redhat's "enhancements" to PG  (Guy Fraser <guy@incentre.net>)
Responses Re: Redhat's "enhancements" to PG  (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Guy Fraser wrote:

> I agree it would be nice to know.
>
> I mentioned this a while back. At the time RH was messing up things
> unrelated to PG, when I mentioned that they keep there "enhancments" to
> them selves rather that use them to better the whole community, I was
> flamed by RH supporters. I have provided fixes and enhancements to
> different software products over the years, and have supplied most bach
> to the community. I don't want to get flamed so I'll just leave it there.

Figure the # of hours that Tom Lane works on PostgreSQL, and the # of
commits and changes he makes ... I think Redhat gives one *helluva* lot
back to the community, no?


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: PlPython
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Problem with duplicate file.