Re: implied FROM - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Stephan Szabo
Subject Re: implied FROM
Date
Msg-id 20030502093219.K65288-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: implied FROM  ("Matt Mello" <alien@spaceship.com>)
List pgsql-sql
On Fri, 2 May 2003, Matt Mello wrote:

> Tomasz Myrta said:
> > <cut>
> > Some people
> > said,  that it is very useful inside update queries. The conclusion was
> > this  behaviour should stay as it is.
>
> We should at least have the ability to change a PG setting to say that we DO
> NOT WANT PG to try to second guess us ('set FORDUMMYS = false', or
> whatever). In my mind, this "feature" is a violation of the spirit of SQL.
> I wish I was on this list for the "vote" everyone took on this.

Actually 7.4 should have an GUC option for this (enable_implicit_from),
see recent posts to -patches.



pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: implied FROM
Next
From: Chris Gamache
Date:
Subject: Re: What is bad in this query ?