Re: pg_autovacuum (pg_avd version 2) - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_autovacuum (pg_avd version 2)
Date
Msg-id 200303182219.h2IMJ0L13955@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_autovacuum (pg_avd version 2)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: pg_autovacuum (pg_avd version 2)  ("Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>)
Re: pg_autovacuum (pg_avd version 2)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
We did, but he contacted me directly asking if it could be put in
/contrib for 7.4 so it would get some testing and usage.  Is that valid?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Did we not tend in the direction of a server-side solution?
>
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
> >
> >     http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
> >
> > I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> > > I have updated my pg_autovacuum program (formerly pg_avd, the name
> > > changed as per discussion on the patches list).
> > >
> > > This version should be a good bit better.  It addresses all the issues
> > > pointed out by Neil Conway. Vacuum and Analyze are now handled
> > > separately.  It now monitors for xid wraparound.  The number of database
> > > connections and queries has been significantly reduced compared the
> > > previous version.  I have moved it from bin to contrib.  More detail on
> > > the changes are in the TODO file.
> > >
> > > I have not tested the xid wraparound code as I have to let my AthlonXP
> > > 1600 run select 1 in a tight loop for approx. two days in order to
> > > perform the required 500,000,000 xacts.
> > >
> > > Side note: in trying to test the xid wrap around code I noted that the
> > > select 1 query is nearly 30% slower with stats_row_level = true.  I
> > > guess this is another reason for a backend integrated autovacuum that
> > > not built on top of the stats system.  I know the net effect is reduced
> > > with more realistic queries but still seems like a lot.
> > >
> > > As always, any and all feedback is appreciated.
> > >
> > > Matthew T. O'Connor
> > >
> > >
> >
> > [ Attachment, skipping... ]
> >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> > >     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
> >
> >
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_autovacuum (pg_avd version 2)
Next
From: "Matthew T. O'Connor"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_autovacuum (pg_avd version 2)