Re: pg_autovacuum (pg_avd version 2) - Mailing list pgsql-patches

Right.  I am trying to work on server-side solution but can't promise to
complete it by June 1.  If I (or someone else) gets a server-side
solution done before the 7.4 feature freeze, then I think we should pull
this out of /contrib.  Otherwise, I find it a useful tool, I have it
running in production and have received some positive feedback from
others who are using it, so /contrib seems safe enough.

On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 17:19, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> We did, but he contacted me directly asking if it could be put in
> /contrib for 7.4 so it would get some testing and usage.  Is that valid?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Did we not tend in the direction of a server-side solution?
> >
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> >
> > > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
> > >
> > >     http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
> > >
> > > I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > > Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> > > > I have updated my pg_autovacuum program (formerly pg_avd, the name
> > > > changed as per discussion on the patches list).
> > > >
> > > > This version should be a good bit better.  It addresses all the issues
> > > > pointed out by Neil Conway. Vacuum and Analyze are now handled
> > > > separately.  It now monitors for xid wraparound.  The number of database
> > > > connections and queries has been significantly reduced compared the
> > > > previous version.  I have moved it from bin to contrib.  More detail on
> > > > the changes are in the TODO file.
> > > >
> > > > I have not tested the xid wraparound code as I have to let my AthlonXP
> > > > 1600 run select 1 in a tight loop for approx. two days in order to
> > > > perform the required 500,000,000 xacts.
> > > >
> > > > Side note: in trying to test the xid wrap around code I noted that the
> > > > select 1 query is nearly 30% slower with stats_row_level = true.  I
> > > > guess this is another reason for a backend integrated autovacuum that
> > > > not built on top of the stats system.  I know the net effect is reduced
> > > > with more realistic queries but still seems like a lot.
> > > >
> > > > As always, any and all feedback is appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Matthew T. O'Connor
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > [ Attachment, skipping... ]
> > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > > > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> > > >     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
> >