Re: [GENERAL] division by zero - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [GENERAL] division by zero
Date
Msg-id 200303101603.h2AG36A28477@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] division by zero  ("Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] division by zero  (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Merlin Moncure wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > 
> > I checked into this, and indeed OS X 10.2 is behaving funny: integer
> > divide by zero doesn't raise any signal, it just returns a bogus
> answer.
> > They're within their rights to do so according to the ANSI C spec
> > (wherein division by zero is stated to have undefined behavior).
> > But since other BSD-derived Unixen all seem to raise SIGFPE, I can't
> > help wondering if this shouldn't be considered a bug.
> 
> FWIW, this also is a problem with some of the windows ports.  For
> example, 'select 0/0' is unpredictable and can cause the server to gpf
> and restart.  This does not include the SRA port, because I don't have
> it.

I just tested the SRA Win32 threaded port and both SELECT 1/0 and SELECT
0/0 crash the process.  I have reported this to Tatsuo.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: Who puts the Windows binaries on the FTP server?
Next
From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig
Date:
Subject: Backends created by ODBC live forever ...