On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 01:35:15PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Cool; if you can do it that way then the wasted-cycles objection is
> gone. (I don't think it would have been very interesting to implement
> the functionality only in the no-readline case, 'cuz just about everyone
> seems to use readline builds.)
OK. I'm attaching my new patch (which is fixed for the bug in the
previous attempt, and now touches a lot more code).
After this, I'll get to work on introducing select(), and once that's
finished we can start experimenting with asynchronous notification
reports.
Jeroen
