Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 01:35:15PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > Cool; if you can do it that way then the wasted-cycles objection is
> > gone. (I don't think it would have been very interesting to implement
> > the functionality only in the no-readline case, 'cuz just about everyone
> > seems to use readline builds.)
>
> OK. I'm attaching my new patch (which is fixed for the bug in the
> previous attempt, and now touches a lot more code).
>
> After this, I'll get to work on introducing select(), and once that's
> finished we can start experimenting with asynchronous notification
> reports.
>
>
> Jeroen
>
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
