Patrick Macdonald wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Someone at Red Hat is working on point-in-time recovery, also known as
> > incremental backups.
>
> PITR and incremental backup are different beasts. PITR deals with a backup
> + logs. Incremental backup deals with a full backup + X smaller/incremental
> backups.
>
> So... it doesn't look like anyone is working on incremental backup at the
> moment.
But why would someone want incremental backups compared to PITR? The
backup would be mixture of INSERTS, UPDATES, and DELETES, right? Seems
pretty weird. :-)
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
