Re: Coding style - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Coding style
Date
Msg-id 200302030055.h130tFP04921@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Coding style  (Nic Ferrier <nferrier@tapsellferrier.co.uk>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Right.  I do it just before every major release, but don't do it other
times becuase it causes too much of a diff.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nic Ferrier wrote:
> "Lars Stenberg" <lars.stenberg@psycat.net> writes:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I wonder if the project-owner want me to watch the entire jdbc source tree
> > and convert into a commonly used coding style. In A file i found at least
> > three different styles:
> >
> > 1) public java.sql.Time getTime(int parameterIndex) throws SQLException
> > {
> >
> > 2) public java.sql.Timestamp getTimestamp(int parameterIndex)
> > throws SQLException {
> >
> > 3) public void setUseServerPrepare(boolean flag) throws SQLException {
> >
> > Might be better if we all use a common codestyle like the third one? Anyhow,
> > if you want me to fix the code so it is consistent just tell me.
>
> I'm not one of the project owners... but I do hack on postgresql and I
> would rather you didn't do that.
>
> The reason is that doing a text mangle will cause revision tracking
> lossage, it's conveiniant sometimes to be able to scan backwards and
> forwards across the revision tree.
>
> I believe that postgresql jdbc code IS consistently indented, I for
> one don't really care what brace style is used.
>
>
> Nic
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: "Lars Stenberg"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_class et el -little OT
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_class et el -little OT