One thing to note is that David might be quite willing to co-ordinate
this, as it would give a very very high profile use of Bricolage?
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 December 2002 08:47 pm, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > Yep, we need to adjust the way that information is stored in the backend
> > > because it's been proving that it's a complete pain to update without
> > > throwing out all of sync all of the non-English versions.
> > >
> > > It's a time and effort thing, and not a small one. Will probably take a
> > > good 8 hours of webmastering effort to re-arrange things and make it
> > > maintainable.
> >
> > Would using a proper content engine like Bricolage help? What are you
> > using at the moment?
> >
>
> After hearing David's interview last night, I definitely think it's worth a
> closer look. In fact it might be something that could be used for all of the
> PostgreSQL web sites, lord knows we're duplicating efforts already.
>
> Robert Treat
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
