Robert,
> * "The best has gotten even better" -- does the wording on this need to be
> changed? Should it be dropped?
I'm ambivalent; I don't think it does any harm, but am not that thrilled with
it either.
> * Complete list of changes -- says to look at the history file, points to a
> readme file, the url doesn't exist.... This whole paragraph needs to be
> reworked. Have we settled on a url for this? ( I thought it was going to
> be something like http://www.advocacy.postgresql.org/changes/73/ )
Did someone volunteer to put this page up? Anyone? Beuller?
> * List of companies in about us -- Are we comfortable with the list of
> companies that were pulled from news articles? Should we add in a government
> agency? IIRC The FREDII website (http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/) runs
> on PostgreSQL.
The supplied list is somewhat off-the-cuff. I volunteer you to put together
a better list. :-)
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
