Bruce,
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 10:42:30AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> To get into the FAQ, it should be something that happens _frequently_,
> hence FAQ.
Understood. That is why is said "for consideration."
> Fact is, cygwin may not even be needed in 7.4 because we are
> working on a native port.
A Win32 native port in the 7.4 time frame is great news! However, I
hope that the Cygwin port will not be deprecated. There are compelling
reasons to still have a Cygwin PostgreSQL port just like there is with
Python, Perl, Vim, Emacs, etc. On the other hand, I wouldn't mind being
put out of the Cygwin PostgreSQL support business... :,)
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6
