Jason Tishler wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 10:42:30AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > To get into the FAQ, it should be something that happens _frequently_,
> > hence FAQ.
>
> Understood. That is why is said "for consideration."
>
> > Fact is, cygwin may not even be needed in 7.4 because we are
> > working on a native port.
>
> A Win32 native port in the 7.4 time frame is great news! However, I
> hope that the Cygwin port will not be deprecated. There are compelling
> reasons to still have a Cygwin PostgreSQL port just like there is with
> Python, Perl, Vim, Emacs, etc. On the other hand, I wouldn't mind being
> put out of the Cygwin PostgreSQL support business... :,)
I see no reason to remove cygwin support. I assume they will both
continue to exist.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
