news.postgresql.org wrote:
> Are they archived like Oracle logs? Oracle writes to a log area and reads
> from the log area to generate archives. The archives are then used for
> recovery in case of corruption. This is important because reading from the
> drive throws off the head used for writing so seeking could be involved
> given this situation where reading and writing happen on the same drive
> concurrently. Oracle minimizes this by filling up, say, 500k of a certain
> disk before writing the logs to the next disk. Then it reads the 500k of
> logs and moves those to the archive. But if postgres doesn't use archives
> then this isn't an issue.
>
> Which leads me to another question... Does Postgres use archive logs and how
> does Postgres recover if it doesn't use archive logs? Or does it not
> recover as well as Oracle?
We sync() the info to disk and then recycle the logs. 7.4 will have
archive of logs, and hance point-in-time recovery.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
