Re: [GENERAL] PGXLOG variable worthwhile? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: [GENERAL] PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Date
Msg-id 20020919014334.I53125-100000@hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] PGXLOG variable worthwhile?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] PGXLOG variable worthwhile?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: [GENERAL] PGXLOG variable worthwhile?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Yea, but you aren't going to be needing to know the xlog directory that
> way, will you?

Why not?  Who are you to tell me how my scripts work, or how they get
their information?  I have a script that runs to tell me how much disk
space each instance is using up, that parses the ps output for the -D
argument ... having -X there would allow me to parse for that as well and,
if it was in the ps output, add that appropriately into the calculations
...

My point is, the functionality is there, and should be documented properly
... encourage ppl to use the GUC setting in postmaster.conf, but just
because you can't grasp that some of us *like* to use command line args,
don't remove such functionality ...




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: The TODO List (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PGXLOG variable worthwhile?