Re: [GENERAL] PGXLOG variable worthwhile? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [GENERAL] PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0209192024540.1307-100000@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] PGXLOG variable worthwhile?  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Marc G. Fournier writes:

> My point is, the functionality is there, and should be documented properly
> ... encourage ppl to use the GUC setting in postmaster.conf, but just
> because you can't grasp that some of us *like* to use command line args,
> don't remove such functionality ...

Top secret information: If it's made a GUC variable, it's automatically a
command-line option.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Beta2 on Friday Morning (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items)
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: AIX compilation problems (was Re: Proposal ...)