Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Date
Msg-id 200209160249.g8G2n1c18660@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> writes:
> > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
> >> Am just wondering if we've ever considered adding a PGXLOG environment
> >> variable that would point to the pg_xlog directory?
> 
> > IMHO, a much better way to support this is to put this information into
> > the config file. That way it can't easily change when you happen to, say,
> > start postgres in the wrong window.
> 
> Yes.  We rejected environment-variable-based xlog location for reasons
> that apply equally well to Windows.  The xlog location *must* be stored
> in a physical file in the data directory; anything else is too unsafe.
> The current technology for that is a symlink.
> 
> While it doesn't have to be a symlink as opposed to some sort of config
> file, I don't have the slightest problem with saying that we don't
> support relocation of xlog on older Windoid platforms.

Agreed.  Win 4.X is pretty dead.  I added this thread to TODO.detail.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal for resolving casting issues
Next
From: Justin Clift
Date:
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?