Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Justin Clift
Subject Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Date
Msg-id 3D8549B0.FA8E3A5B@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> Tom Lane wrote:
<snip>
> > While it doesn't have to be a symlink as opposed to some sort of config
> > file, I don't have the slightest problem with saying that we don't
> > support relocation of xlog on older Windoid platforms.
> 
> Agreed.  Win 4.X is pretty dead.  I added this thread to TODO.detail.

Huh?  You've got to be joking.

Many of the *really large* enterprises around (i.e. with 40k+ PC's, etc)
are still running WinNT 4, due to the migration issues with upgrading. 
Aka, Too Many Things Break when they move to Win2k, etc.

Although MS no longer considers WinNT 4.0 to be a supported platform,
there are *lots* of big places still running it.

That's part of the reason some of the bigger corporates are looking for
MS alternatives.

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

> 
> --
>   Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
>   pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
>   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
>   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

-- 
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."  - Indira Gandhi


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?