Rod Taylor wrote:
>
> > Yes, I thought about that. People want to show both SELECT syntaxes,
> > but how would you do that --- show the SELECT syntax twice with just
> > those last two clauses reversed --- yuck.
>
> select .... [ <stmt group>, ... ]
>
> <stmt group> :
> [ FOR UPDATE | LIMIT ]
>
>
> The above, or something along those lines, would show order
> independence.
It is this kind of added abstraction that I definitely want to avoid.
SELECT has enough complexity without adding to it. If this change was
required, I would suggest just backing out the entire patch and leaving
it alone.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
