> Yes, I thought about that. People want to show both SELECT syntaxes,
> but how would you do that --- show the SELECT syntax twice with just
> those last two clauses reversed --- yuck.
select .... [ <stmt group>, ... ]
<stmt group> : [ FOR UPDATE | LIMIT ]
The above, or something along those lines, would show order
independence.
> We could easily mention that we allow both clause orderings in the text
> somewhere.
