On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 13:13:29 -0400 (EDT)
"Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
> First, I think we need a section in the admin/maintenance manual talking
> about reindex. (We already have vacuum there, and I think reindex is
> something that periodically also should be done.)
One simple improvement would be to change the documentation's view of
REINDEX -- at the moment, it says that it's only useful for rebuilding
"corrupted indexes". If it's a legitimate maintainence activity for
certain query loads, it should get a more positive spin.
Also, could we enhance REINDEX to not require an exclusive table lock?
Without looking at the code, I would think that we could at least allow
for SELECTs (using seqscans or other indexes) while a REINDEX is running.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
