Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL
Date
Msg-id 200203220627.g2M6RN314503@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> > Say in the future we want to support changing column type as well.  How
> > would we work that in?
> 
> > ALTER TABLE blah ALTER COLUMN col SET int4;  ??????
> 
> Seems one keyword shy of a load; I'd prefer
> 
> ALTER TABLE blah ALTER COLUMN col SET TYPE int4;
> 
> Otherwise, every keyword that might appear after SET will have to be
> fully reserved (else it couldn't be distinguished from a type name).
> 
> I like the "SET NULL"/"SET NOT NULL" variant better than SET/DROP, even
> though "SET NULL" is perhaps open to misinterpretation.  "DROP NOT NULL"
> seems just as confusing for anyone who's not read the documentation :-(

Yes, DROP NOT NULL does have a weird twist to it.  However, does SET
NULL sound to much like you are setting all the values to NULL?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem with reloading groups in pg_hba.conf