On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 01:23:59AM -0500, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> On 1 Mar 2002, Neil Conway wrote:
>
> > Why do you need 'vacuum full' rather than just 'vacuum'? Read the docs,
> > it's usually not necessary.
>
> Because every night I delete/reload a big chunk of my data and then once a
> week I delete/reload the entire dataset... about 7 million records.
This is one thing that is slightly confusing (to me) about the new
vacuum -- perhaps someone more familiar with the internals can
clarify?
I thought that, in the case Mr Reyes is talking about, Postgres would
again use the freed disk space. It's just that the space would not
be available to other applications. I thought what VACUUM FULL did
was just free the disk space _absolutely_.
If I'm right, does that also mean that performance is actually
(marginally) _better_ in these types of cases, because the system
doesn't need to request new disk blocks from the OS?
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 87 Mowat Avenue
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info> M6K 3E3
+1 416 646 3304 x110
