> > As of PostgreSQL, I don't think it would be a hard thing to put
> > on, since the
> > relations are stored in a system table, including the fields the
> > tables are
> > linked by. A sort of syntax :
> >
> > select *
> > from AUTO JOIN t1, t2;
>
> How is this different from:
>
> select *
> from t1 NATURAL JOIN t2;
>
> ???
I think he still wants it to work even if the columns aren't named
the same. In any case, this isn't likely to be reasonable
right now due to the format of that information in the system
tables.
