elog() cleanup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject elog() cleanup
Date
Msg-id 200202210548.g1L5mk103641@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
I have sent a patch to patches that has the following changes:

o Uniformly spaces tags so log message are indented the same amount:LOG:     database system was shut down at
2002-02-1905:51:35 CETLOG:     checkpoint record is at 0/BF1D8ACLOG:     redo record is at 0/BF1D8AC; undo record is at
0/0;Shut...LOG:     next transaction id: 242; next oid: 866295LOG:     database system is readyERROR:   parser: parse
errorat or near "asdf"
 

o Renames REALLYFATAL to CRASH (per Tom)

o Remove STOP and make it CRASH

o Add INFO level that prints only to the client

o Add LOG level to print messages only to the server log

o Cause VACUUM to only print to the client

o Change NOTICE to INFO when informational messages are sent.  This
mimics the behavior of syslog(3). Before we only had NOTICE.  INFO now
gives us LOG_INFO for messages like sequence creation with SERIAL:
    LOG_ALERT     A condition that should be corrected immediately, such as a                  corrupted system
database.
    LOG_CRIT      Critical conditions, e.g., hard device errors.
    LOG_ERR       Errors.
    LOG_WARNING   Warning messages.
    LOG_NOTICE    Conditions that are not error conditions, but should possi-                  bly be handled
specially.
    LOG_INFO      Informational messages.
    LOG_DEBUG     Messages that contain information normally of use only when                  debugging a program.

o Server startup message now are labeled with LOG instead of DEBUG,
preventing confusion when people think they have debug enabled.

Comments?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: PostgreSQL 8.0 ??
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 ??