Re: Database abstration layers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Matthew T. O'Connor
Subject Re: Database abstration layers
Date
Msg-id 200202081907.g18J7vG15655@neuromancer.ctlno.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Database abstration layers  (Jean-Michel POURE <jm.poure@freesurf.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 08 February 2002 10:23 am, Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am looking at available database abstraction layers with the idea of
> porting pgAdmin2 to Linux. This is just for information, my project is not
> clear by now.

what is your goal?  

If it's to port pgAdmin2 to Linux, then why do you need a database 
abstraction layer?  Why not use direct calls to postgres?  Most language have 
native support (C, C++, PHP, Python, Perl...)   Is it not true that pgAdmin 
under windows has some limitations due to the fact that it's usind ODBC?

If it's to write a generic database management tool that can be used against 
different databases then the need for an abstraction layer is obvious.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8ZCKG8BXvT14W9HARAoiHAJ9eJIsynNIc6GJ01NqlSN+R5v4AiACcCcUa
cu4e5Lyd3K0c85vTAZ+2Q/o=
=XwtN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 7.2 on SlashDot
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Maintaining the list of release changes