Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From MindTerm
Subject Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction
Date
Msg-id 20011214024652.79128.qmail@web20210.mail.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>)
Responses Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction
List pgsql-sql
Hi,
 I am writing a function (plpgsql) which equals to a
single transaction transaction in postgresql ( as I
known ). So I think that it is not a autocommmit mode.
 I have add following lines in postgresql.conf.

postgresql.conf:
====================
shared_buffers = 640
wal_buffers = 80


M.T.
 

--- Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, MindTerm wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> >   I am writing a large function which perform more
> > than 2000 modify statements ( delete / insert ) .
> The
> > execution time of this function is not acceptable.
> How
> > can I config postgresql ( in postgresql.conf ?? )
> so
> > that the performance will be better ? The machine
> > runing postgresql have spare memory and harddisk
> > space.
> 
> It's hard without more information, is the function
> like
> an internal function or do you mean an external one?
> In the latter case, the first thing to do is make
> sure you're not in autocommit (ie, you've begun a
> transaction) since otherwise you're doing 2000
> separate transactions.
> The settings that are the first to look at in the
> postgresql.conf are shared_buffers and sort_mem.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction