Re: Further open item (Was: Status of 7.2) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Further open item (Was: Status of 7.2)
Date
Msg-id 200111192007.fAJK7MA16921@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Further open item (Was: Status of 7.2)  ("Tille, Andreas" <TilleA@rki.de>)
Responses Re: Further open item (Was: Status of 7.2)
List pgsql-hackers
> > There is not much point in arguing a specific query case,
> It is no specific query case.  It is the speed of an index scan which
> goes like N if you do it with PostgreSQL and it goes like log N if
> you do not have to look back into the table like MS SQL server does.

Have you tried using CLUSTER to match the heap order with the index
order.  That should help with index scans looking up heap rows.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: New TODO item