Re: Default shared memory SGML mention - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Default shared memory SGML mention
Date
Msg-id 200105082054.f48KsNe29941@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Default shared memory SGML mention  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-docs
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Yes, but shared memory limits are based on buffers, not connections,
> > right?  The per-connection overhead is pretty small, no?
>
> I gave you my experimentally-derived formula already:
>
>     250Kb + 8350 * B + 14580 * N
>
> I don't see how you can consider the N term negligible.

Oh, I misread it.  I thought the 14.5k was part of the 250k.  Let me fix
that.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Default shared memory SGML mention
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Default shared memory SGML mention