Re: Default shared memory SGML mention - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Default shared memory SGML mention
Date
Msg-id 8134.989354268@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Default shared memory SGML mention  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Default shared memory SGML mention  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Default shared memory SGML mention  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-docs
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Yes, but shared memory limits are based on buffers, not connections,
> right?  The per-connection overhead is pretty small, no?

I gave you my experimentally-derived formula already:

    250Kb + 8350 * B + 14580 * N

I don't see how you can consider the N term negligible.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Default shared memory SGML mention
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Default shared memory SGML mention