Re: Lisp as procedural language - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Lisp as procedural language
Date
Msg-id 200105072206.f47M6tv04008@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Lisp as procedural language  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Lisp as procedural language  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Can someone explain why we have a lisp.sgml file in our docs?  Seems it
> > descripes a 3rd party Emacs interface.  I don't think we should start
> > distributing docs for software we don't distribute.  Can I remove it?
> 
> Only if you move the pointer to someplace more appropriate (don't we
> have somewhere on the website with links to outside software?)

We sure do:
http://postgresql.readysetnet.com/interfaces.html

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about Postgres))
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole?