Re: Lisp as procedural language - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Lisp as procedural language
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0105082121500.759-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Lisp as procedural language  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian writes:

> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > Can someone explain why we have a lisp.sgml file in our docs?  Seems it
> > > descripes a 3rd party Emacs interface.  I don't think we should start
> > > distributing docs for software we don't distribute.  Can I remove it?
> >
> > Only if you move the pointer to someplace more appropriate (don't we
> > have somewhere on the website with links to outside software?)
>
> We sure do:
>
>     http://postgresql.readysetnet.com/interfaces.html

Might as well move pgadmin.sgml there too.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Lisp as procedural language
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: incorrect query result using complex structures (views?)