Re: Lisp as procedural language - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Lisp as procedural language
Date
Msg-id 200105081929.f48JTMP24768@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Lisp as procedural language  ("Vladimir V. Zolotych" <gsmith@eurocom.od.ua>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> 
> > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > > Can someone explain why we have a lisp.sgml file in our docs?  Seems it
> > > > descripes a 3rd party Emacs interface.  I don't think we should start
> > > > distributing docs for software we don't distribute.  Can I remove it?
> > >
> > > Only if you move the pointer to someplace more appropriate (don't we
> > > have somewhere on the website with links to outside software?)
> >
> > We sure do:
> >
> >     http://postgresql.readysetnet.com/interfaces.html
> 
> Might as well move pgadmin.sgml there too.

Agreed.  Removed.  

However, I see no mention of pgadmin in our Interfaces or Enhancements
page.  Do we want to add it?  There is lots of stuff on greatbridge.org
now, (including my pgmonitor :-).  Is there stuff on pgsql.com too?  Not
sure how to get those listed.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about Postgres))
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Lisp as procedural language