Re: Lisp as procedural language - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Lisp as procedural language
Date
Msg-id 23155.989270572@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Lisp as procedural language  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Lisp as procedural language  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Can someone explain why we have a lisp.sgml file in our docs?  Seems it
> descripes a 3rd party Emacs interface.  I don't think we should start
> distributing docs for software we don't distribute.  Can I remove it?

Only if you move the pointer to someplace more appropriate (don't we
have somewhere on the website with links to outside software?)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Steve Wampler
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: File system performance and pg_xlog (More info)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: typo in psql's help